Expo 67 (2024)

Choice of the theme and the site of the exhibition

Senator Mark Drouin and Senator Sarto Fournier, former mayor of Montréal, first presented the idea of Montreal hosting Expo 67 to the Bureau International des Expositions in Paris,but that body initially decided that the 1967 world exhibition should be held in Moscow. In late 1962, the USSR cancelled its plans and Montréal's mayor, Jean Drapeau, made afresh presentation to the BIE. The exhibition was awarded to Canada. That Expo 67 was sanctioned by the BIE virtually assured participation by a majority of the countries of the world. What is more, the BIE designated it as an exhibition of the "firstcategory," the first to be held in North America. The most important aspect of this "first category" classification is that the exposition must cover the full range of activities of contemporary humanity.

Legislation passed by the House of Commons in late 1962 established a crown company, the Canadian Corporation for the 1967 World Exhibition, to build and run Expo 67. The exhibition was to be a three-way partnership, with 50 per cent participation bythe federal government, 37.5 per cent by the Québec government and 12.5 per cent by the city of Montréal. With time pressing, the three governments called a conference of educators, literary figures and intellectuals at Montebello, Québec, to choosea central theme and evolve a philosophy for the exhibition. "Man and His World," the theme chosen at the Montebello conference, derived from the title of a book by the French author, poet and aviator Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, Terre des Hommes.On schedule in late 1963, the master plan was completed and submitted to Parliament. By late 1966, the corporation listed approximately $320 million as capital-incurred costs of Expo 67 and $138 million as anticipated revenue, yielding an expected deficitof $182 million.

The choice of a site for the exhibition presented many difficulties, not the least of which was the shortage of time. Many proposals were studied, but it was finally decided Île Sainte-Hélène, a park in the centre of the St. Lawrence Riverlinked to Montréal by the Jacques Cartier Bridge, would be expanded by land reclamation techniques using silt and rock dredged from the bottom of the river. In addition, a new island, Île Notre-Dame, would be created adjoining Île Sainte-Hélène and alongsidethe St. Lawrence Seaway. River bottom sources of landfill proved insufficient and for months parades of dump trucks bringing landfill moved to the site on a 24-hour-a-daybasis. The cost of building the site rose from the original estimate of $10 million to $40 million.

Despite all the problems, the site was formally turned over to the exhibition corporation on 1 July 1964. As finally developed, it was divided into four main areas. The entrance at Cité du Havre was formerly known as Mackay Pier, a part of the port ofMontréal. From the Cité du Havre, the new Concordia Bridge across the St. Lawrence led to the first exhibition area on the western section of Île Sainte-Hélène. The third area was the Île Notre-Dame. The fourth, La Ronde, at the eastern end of Île Sainte-Hélène,contained most of the amusem*nt activities.

Buildings and Exhibitions

The theme program was divided into five main groups: Man the Creator, Man the Explorer, Man the Producer, Man the Provider, and Man and the Community. These, in turn, were divided into subgroups. To implement the theme, the exhibition corporation investedalmost $40 million in theme buildings strategically located around the site to serve as "points of polarization" for the theme groups. Illustrating Man the Creator was an exhibit of approximately 160 paintings borrowed from museums and individuals worldwide.Also part of this sub-theme were exhibitions of sculpture, photography and industrial design.The social sciences and humanities were grouped under Man and the Community.

Pavilions

The nations that agreed to participate in Expo 67 either built their own pavilions or combined with other nations in regional pavilions. Among them, the Soviet Union spent approximately $15 million; Czechoslovakia, $10 million; and the United States,more than $9 million. The approaches taken by some of the world's greatest architects in designing the pavilions were varied and frequently breathtaking. Arthur Erickson'spyramidal Man in His Community was built from hexagonal frames of Douglas fir; the German pavilion, a 15-storey, multi-peaked tent of plastic, indicated how concept and materialsmight radically alter the design of buildings such as auditoriums; and Buckminster Fuller's geodesic dome for the US became the prototype for a new trend in construction. The interiors of the pavilions also varied greatly. Some presented prosaic displaysof consumer goods and machinery while others imaginatively depicted their history and cultural traditions. Montréal architect Moshe Safdie's revolutionary Habitat'67was a graphic demonstration that by industrializing the building process, there are better and cheaper ways to house people. Expo also witnessed the development of newapproaches to viewing film. The multi-screen technique was omnipresent, transforming everyday sights and sounds into more vital images.

Expo 67 also encouraged participation by private industry and by special groups. In the latter category, seven Christian churches combined to present a Christian pavilion; others included the United NationsAssociation, the European Economic Community, the House of Judaism, sponsored by the Canadian Jewish community, and the Youth Pavilion.

At the invitation of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, First Nations artists came together to create the Indians of Canada Pavilion(see Federal Departments of Indigenous and Northern Affairs). The Indians of Canada Pavilion was separate from other provincial and nationalpavilions at Expo 67. This pavilion shared contemporary Indigenous art, including exterior murals and an interior exhibit. The pavilion included artworkfrom notable contemporary Indigenous artists like Norval Morrisseau, Robert Davidson,Alex Javier and Carl Ray. The pavilion shared contemporary issues facing Indigenous peoples in starkand direct terms that were shocking to some visitors.

Under BIE rules, each country taking part in the exhibition may send performing artists as a part of its participation. The World Arts Festival was thus able to include on its schedule such internationally known groups as La Scala Opera Company from Milan,Sir Laurence Olivier's National Theatre from Great Britain, the New York Philharmonic, the Amsterdam Concertgebouw, and classical theatre from Greece. Expo 67 and the Montréal International Film Festival combined to present a festival of more than 30feature films during August. Sports events included an international soccer tournament, a lacrosse tournamentand a European-American track meet. Spectacles such as a western rodeo and the first North Americanappearance of the Gendarmerie française rounded out the festivities at this, the crowning event of Canada's birthday celebration.

Impacts

There were some 120 governments present at Expo in 60 pavilions, and thousands of private exhibitors and sponsors participated in 53 private pavilions and through various facilities on the site. The exhibition site was planned to accommodate 26 millionindividual visits over a 183-day period. In fact, there were over 50 million paid admissions recorded from 28 April to 27 October, not counting over 5 million admissions by performers, the press, official visitors and employees. Expo 67 cost Canada,Québec and Montréal $283 million to put together and to run. Independent economic studies indicated that the return to federal, provincialand municipal taxpayers was almost double that amount. For example, the increase in touristrevenues in 1967 directly related to Expo was calculated at $480 million.